Ohio State is in the process of revising websites and program materials to accurately reflect compliance with the law. While this work occurs, language referencing protected class status or other activities prohibited by Ohio Senate Bill 1 may still appear in some places. However, all programs and activities are being administered in compliance with federal and state law.

Ring Theory Seminar - Sultan Eylem Toksoy

Sultan Eylem Toksoy
August 31, 2018
4:45 pm - 5:45 pm
Cockins Hall 240

Title: Modules with minimal copure-injectivity domain

SpeakerSultan Eylem Toksoy (Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey)

Abstract: $R$ will denote an associative ring with identity element and modules will be unital right $R$-modules unless otherwise stated. A right $R$-module $M$ is said to be cofinitely generated if $E(M)=E(S_{1})\oplus E(S_{2})\oplus\ldots\oplus E(S_{n})$, where $S_{1}, S_{2},\ldots, S_{n}$ are simple right $R$-modules and $E(X)$ is the injective hull of a right $R$-module $X$ (see [6] and [5]). A right $R$-module $M$ is called a cofree module if $M$ is isomorphic to $\prod\{E(S_{\alpha})\mid S_{\alpha}$ is a simple right $R$-module, $\alpha\in I\}$ where $I$ is some index set (see \cite{related}). A right $R$-module $M$ is said to be cofinitely related if there is an exact sequence $M \rightarrow N \rightarrow K$ of $R$-modules with $N$ cofinitely generated, cofree and $K$ cofinitely generated (see [2]). In [3], the notion of copurity has introduced as dual to the notion of purity using cofinitely related modules. A submodule $L$ of a right $R$-module $M$ is said to be copure if for every cofinitely related right $R$-module $K$, every homomorphism from $L$ into $K$ has an extension to $M$. A short exact sequence of right $R$-modules $A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C$ is called a copure short exact sequence if every cofinitely related right $R$-module is injective with respect to this sequence. So a submodule $L$ of a right $R$-module $M$ is said to be copure in $M$ if the canonical short exact sequence $ L \rightarrow M \rightarrow M/L$ is copure.

Let $M$ and $N$ be right $R$-modules. $M$ is said to be $N$-copure-injective if every homomorphism from a copure submodule of $N$ to $M$ can be extended to a homomorphism from $N$ to $M$. $M$ is copure-injective if it is injective relative to every copure short exact sequence of right $R$-modules (see [4]). We define a right $R$-module $M$ as copure-split module if every copure submodule of $M$ is a direct summand and we prove that a ring $R$ is a right CDS ring if and only if every $R$-module is copure-injective if and only if every $R$-module is copure-split. We define a right $R$-module $M$ to be copure-injectively-poor (simply copi-poor) if the copure-injectivity domain of $M$ is minimal and we study properties of copi-poor modules. Rings over which every right $R$-module is copi-poor is shown to be right CDS rings. In [1], it is proved that $R$ is a right PDS ring if and only if every right $R$-module is pi-poor. Since commutative PDS rings are CDS (see [4]), a copi-poor module need not be pi-poor in general and conversely. We prove that over commutative (co-)noetherian rings a module is pi-poor if and only if it is copi-poor. Therefore it is obtained that copi-poor Abelian groups coincide with pi-poor Abelian groups.

Bibliography

  1. A. Harmanci, S. R. López-Permouth and B. Üngör, On the pure-injectivity profile of a ring, Comm. Algebra 43 (11) (2015) 4984--5002.
  2. V. A. Hiremath, Cofinitely generated and cofinitely related modules, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 39 (1982) 1--9.
  3. V. A. Hiremath (Madurai), Copure Submodules, Acta Math. Hung. 44(1-2) (1984) 3--12.
  4. V. A. Hiremath, Copure-injective modules, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 20 (3) (1989) 250--259.
  5. J. P. Jans, On co-noetherian rings, J. London Math. Soc. 1 (1969) 588--590.
  6. P. Vamos, On the dual of the notion of "finitely generated", J. London Math. Soc. 43 (1968) 643--646. 

Events Filters: